We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.

Daycrist • 6 months ago

Sanji out here living his dream.....

Gohario • 7 months ago

I'd garchu Nami in that fit so fucking hard

Jilebi James • 3 months ago

bruh all these comments, u gotta chill lol

Gohario • 7 months ago

bro what

Gohario • 7 months ago

PAUSED AT 17:12

Please.

Please.

....

.
.
.
..
Please.

Im going to unpause the video RIGHT NOW, and when I unpause, the camera will continue zooming out, and it is NOT going to cut away, and we will see Nami cheekage in it's greatest element.

Oda.

Toei.

please.

grant me this.

just this.

I don't ask for much, please.

ok here we go,

*EDIT*

My disappointment is immeasurable and my day is ruined.

curse you oda

curse you toei

*edit again*

17:57
how dare they tease us with this. they know exactly what greatness could have transpired upon the screen. but no, they'd rather show us just a drop in the ocean.

Gohario • 7 months ago

14:02

Brook Racist as fuck wth

They aren't just dogs, they're minks. You don't see the minks referring to the main cast as straight up "monkeys" or "apes" do you? Smdh Brook

Gohario • 7 months ago

13:57

"Let me Garchu"

ohh nawwwwwwwwwww

Gohario • 7 months ago

13:40

Oda boutta make me risk it all

.
.
.
.
.

naw but deadass, Oda really said, "Yo im trynna draw some furries in provocative clothing for a whole arc" and really did it

Gohario • 7 months ago

12:34

The ONLY fitting reaction, Sanji stays being unfathomably based

Gohario • 7 months ago

paused at 12:03

damn sanji really been catching dubs for a minute now if you think about it:

the mermaids were litty wit him, he bagged viola, he coulda r e a l l y scored if he ever made actual direct contact with Baby 5, and now he's boutta yiff yiff on furry island.

Does this mean, I was wrong?! It wasn't Brook who engaged in sexual activities with the furries, it was SANJII!????!!! let's find out

*edit*
rip

Gohario • 7 months ago

tf? no comments? this can't be right...

guess i have to spam it with capricious redundant observations